The following are exerpts from the Sept. 20, 2007 60 Minutes interview with Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadeinejad by correspondent Scott Pelley
****
PELLEY: As a goodwill gesture, will you say right now in this interview that you will do everything in your power to prevent Iranian arms from entering Iraq?
AHMADINEJAD: Well, Iranian forces are not inside Iraq. Can you show me one?
PELLEY: No sir, Iranian arms, sir.
AHMADINEJAD: Please, allow me to continue. Please, allow me to finish my thought. The American government has admitted that with more than 160,000 troops, state-of-the-art military equipment, they have failed to control and put a stop to the activities of these few people. That’s very unfortunate. You shouldn’t accuse others because you have certain problems yourself. Very clearly, we are friends to all. We very much are saddened with war. We are very much saddened that American troops are being killed, losing their lives over there. So you don’t know the people of the region. I think that the British government was smarter. They left the city of Basra, pulled out their forces. And once the British soldiers left the city, the local people celebrated. And today, unfortunately, you’re opposing the Iraqi people. You could have stood side by side with the Iraqi people. Again, whenever you correct your policies, it helps everyone. It benefits you. It benefits Iraq. It benefits all the peoples of the region. We’re using everything in our power to provide security in Iraq. We have said so on many occasions. Whoever is killed in Iraq, that would sadden us.
PELLEY: Mr. President, we appreciate your thoughts. Some people watching this interview, frankly, will think that you’re dodging the questions because many of the questions that I ask you are fairly straightforward “yes” or “no” questions. And let me try this one again, if I may. Will you pledge tonight to do everything in your power to prevent Iranian arms from entering Iraq? Can you make that pledge?
AHMADINEJAD: Well, I think you have been charged with a mission to repeat a sentence over and over again. My comments are very clear. I think that you should go back and take American officials to task. Use the same force you’re using right now so that they take the troops out.
PELLEY: Was that a “yes” or a “no,” sir?
AHMADINEJAD: If you are to take sides, well, I don’t know. Well, you shouldn’t tell me what kind of answer I should give to you. You’re free to ask me questions. I didn’t put any limitations on your questions.
PELLEY: True.
AHMADINEJAD: I’m free to give my own answers. I think that all of us should go to American officials and ask them: “What are you looking for in Iraq? Let’s be clear. Why have you stayed behind? Why are you accusing others? And your policies have created insecurity. You are behind terrorism. So once you correct your ways, these things will take care of themselves. Why are you using a road that goes to nowhere? Use the correct road.”
AHMADINEJAD: We support the rights of all nations. We love all nations. And the message of the Iranian people is friendship with all. In our history, we have never attacked another country, occupied another country. This is a peace-loving nation. And you should remember that we are living within our borders. And people who have brought troops from thousands of miles away, they are the ones who should be held accountable and responsible.
****
PELLEY: Mr. President, you say you love all nations. I have to assume that includes the Nation of Israel.
AHMADINEJAD: Israel is not a nation. Well, we like the people, yes, because they are victims as well. They used to live in their own countries, in their own cities. They were given empty promises, false promises. They said that we are going to give you jobs, we are going to give you security. And they pushed the local Palestinian people out and made them refugees and also made refugees of another community.
****
PELLEY: If the Palestinians reach an agreement with Israel for a two-state solution, will you then recognize Israel as well?
AHMADINEJAD: Well, the decision rests with the Palestinian people. This is exactly what I’m saying.
PELLEY: What would you do, sir?
AHMADINEJAD: What I’m saying is that you should allow — oh, please, let me finish my thought. What we are saying, our solution for Palestine is a humane one. We are saying that you should allow the Palestinian people to participate in a fair and free election and determine their own fate. Whatever decision they take, everyone should go with that.
PELLEY: And if that decision . . .
AHMADINEJAD: No other party must interfere. We are not telling the Palestinian people what decisions they should take. Let them make their own decision. Whatever decision they take, we will go for that.
PELLEY: And if that decision is a two-state solution, you’re good with that? You could support a two-state solution?
AHMADINEJAD: Well, why are you prejudging what will happen? Let’s pave the ground first for a free and fair choice. And once they make their choice, we must respect that. All the people, all the Palestinian people must be given this opportunity, allow them to make their own decisions. Let us not tell them what course of action they need to take.
****
PELLEY: For the sake of clarity, because there is so much concern in the world about this next question, please give me the most direct answer you can. Is it your goal to build a nuclear bomb?
AHMADINEJAD: What are you driving at?
PELLEY: Simply that, sir. Is it the goal of your government, the goal of this nation to build a nuclear weapon?
AHMADINEJAD: Do you think that the nuclear technology is only limited in a bomb? You can only build a bomb with that?
PELLEY: No, I appreciate the differences, sir, but the question is limited to the bomb.
AHMADINEJAD: It has different uses. Well, you have to appreciate we don’t need a nuclear bomb. We don’t need that. What needs do we have for a bomb?
PELLEY: May I take that as a “no,” sir?
****
PELLEY: What trait do you admire in President Bush?
AHMADINEJAD: Again, I have a very frank tone. I think that President Bush needs to correct his ways.
PELLEY: What do you admire about him?
AHMADEINEJAD: He should respect the American people.
PELLEY: Is there anything? Any trait?
AHMADINEJAD: As an American citizen, tell me what trait do you admire?
PELLEY: Well, Mr. Bush is, without question, a very religious man, for example, as you are. I wonder if there’s anything that you’ve seen in President Bush that you admire.
AHMADEINEJAD: Well, is Mr. Bush a religious man?
PELLEY: Very much so. As you are.
AHMADEINEJAD: What religion, please tell me, tells you as a follower of that religion to occupy another country and kill its people? Please tell me. Does Christianity tell its followers to do that? Judaism, for that matter? Islam, for that matter? What prophet tells you to send 160,000 troops to another country, kill men, women, and children? You just can’t wear your religion on your sleeve or just go to church. You should be truthfully religious. Religion tells us all that you should respect the property, the life of different people. Respect human rights. Love your fellow man. And once you hear that a person has been killed, you should be saddened. You shouldn’t sit in a room, a dark room, and hatch plots. And because of your plots, many thousands of people are killed. Having said that, we respect the American people. And because of our respect for the American people, we respectfully talk with President Bush. We have a respectful tone. But having said that, I don’t think that that is a good definition of religion. Religion is love for your fellow man, brotherhood, telling the truth.
****
PELLEY: You mentioned telling the truth as a Muslim, and as you know so much better than I do, Verse 42 of the second sura: “The truth shall not be obscured by falsehood, and those who know the truth must tell it.” But when I ask you a question as direct as “Will you pledge not to test a nuclear weapon?” you you dance all around the question. You never say “yes.” You never say “no.”
AHMADEINEJAD: Well, thank you for that. You are like a CIA investigator. And you are . . .
PELLEY: I am just a reporter. I am a simple, average American reporter.
AHMADEINEJAD: This is not a Baghdad prison. Please, this is not a secret prison in Europe. This is not Abu Ghraib. This is Iran. I’m the president of this country. Well, I think that I’ve gone beyond what you’ve asked me, above and beyond. And I think that if you speak to your job as a reporter, what I have said so far, again, goes above and beyond what you ask me.
****
PELLEY: One last thing. So important for the American people to understand. When your airplane approaches Manhattan this week, you will look out the window and you will see that the World Trade Center is gone. Many Americans, Mr. President, to be frank, believe that you look out that window and you say to yourself, “Good. Somebody got ‘em.” They believe our countries are enemies.
AHMADEINEJAD: Well, you shouldn’t speak on behalf of the American people. I can speak on behalf of the Iranian people, but you cannot speak on behalf of the American people. Why do you insist on doing that? Why do you not allow the American people to speak for themselves? Why? Let them speak for themselves. The people gathered around the White House a couple of days ago. They spoke whatever was in their hearts and minds. Are they not American citizens? Hundreds of thousands of people have rallied against the war. Are they not citizens? Our government at the time expressed its condemnation. We issued an official communiqué condemning that incident. How can you, in your mind, accuse and condemn others? Well, if an Iranian person for that matter had done the same thing, it would have been shameful, and it would not have been fair. So, again, this is not fair. Maybe this is your point of view or also perhaps your editor’s point of view. And you are saying that the American people are saying these things. The American people still don’t know who was behind the bombing of the Twin Towers. Many books in the U.S. have been written about the incident., and there are questions circling in your society. Once you go back, go to the streets, ask the local people who was behind this, what were the reason for that? And, again, I fail to see why you continually say “the American people.“ I have the latest surveys. Eighty percent of the American citizens say that the American government knew about the attack beforehand. They had information.
PELLEY: You don’t believe that, sir.
AHMADEINEJAD: I’m not making a judgment here, mind you. I’m not being judgmental. That’s not important for me. What is important for me is to find out why this happened. We can take a course of action which ensures this never happens. Why should we manage the world like this? It’s very possible for us all to be friends, for the world to be in peace, and for the family of man to love one another and to not hate one another. So who propagates these ideas, I ask you. We should all be friends. We should deal fairly with one another, respect one another. Nations do not have any problems when it comes to interacting with one another. Unethical politicians make war. Nations don’t make war. We’re saying that you should allow our nations to be friends with one another. We condemned that incident right there and then. Why should many innocent people be killed? For what reason? Well, behind this building there is another building, a building which in 1360 Iranian calendar, some 25 years ago, the Iranian president and the prime minister in the office, they were blown up by terrorists, a bomb planted by terrorists. And the president and the prime minister burned in that bomb, by that bomb. And, again, this is very regrettable that those terrorists, which were behind that bombing and other assassinations in this country, can freely have access to American officials are being protected by the American Army in Iraq. So this country is a victim of terrorism throughout its history. So you cannot produce even one document, a single document, about terrorist action on the part of the Iranian government or Iranian officials. We are very clear in our position. We say that we spiritually support the right of the Palestinian people and also independence for Iraq. We have nothing to hide. We are very much opposed to the Iraqi occupation. Again, we have nothing to hide. It’s very regrettable that many thousands of people were killed in the Twin Tower incident. We have announced time and again. And what we are asking is can we do something that ensures this never happens? And the answer is “yes.” We can do that, providing a number of parties do not establish terrorist organizations and set them off on nations. We know who is behind terrorist organizations. You know full well who is behind a number of terrorist organizations around my part of the world, that is. Who provided them with logistical support, political support? It’s a very well-known fact they have made and created these terrorist organizations themselves.
PELLEY: Who, sir?
AHMADINEJAD: It’s very clear. Very clear.
PELLEY: Make it clearer. Name the names.
AHMADEINEJAD: I don’t want to name names. I don’t want to name names. But the terrorist organizations in Afghanistan, who is behind them? And what intelligence organization belonging to what country is behind them? This is very clear.
Full transcripts (including unaired portions) can be found here (part I) and here (part II).
Uhm, yeah… I think God did send troops into a few different places with directions to, pretty much if not completely, wipe them out. I tell you… I can’t hardly listen to the back and forth in these types of interviews. He’s not going to give you any kind of answer that you want to hear!! Why give him that forum?
:):)
Tammy
Yes, He did Tammy. It is refreshing to hear that someone else recalls that little fact. Ah…I can’t say why someone would give him that forum (this was a CBS interview…and I think it was very helpful to have on record some of the things that Ahadeinejad says)…but look at the latest post above for my review on the UC speech. Again, no sense in giving the forum…but once we have, we might as well use it to its fullest extent on our behalf.
Seriously, did God declare war and condone killing of people? Can you educate me on this story? I am surprised I never heard of this as it seems something that extremist Muslims and atheists would jump on.
I do believe Ahadeinejad is a brilliant politician and many of the things he said are true even if he didnt directly answer questions, if some of what he said was laid out with no author attached, I think a lot more people would be nodding their head in agreement instead of condemning him.. now there are reasons to condemn him, I am talking specifically about this interview snippet.
Yes, Missey, He did for violation of His Law. I can name a few for you, but only if you promise to look into the context and not be snookered into what the church (w/o His Law) purports leaving individuals to perceive of a distant and cruel God…which is just as bad as the milk-toast Jesus so many of them pass off. It is also very important that one knows the difference on a deep spiritual level between the act of murder, justified versus unjustified killing, war, execution, testing vs. tempting, etc. in order not to be confounded. This isn’t a slam on you…or on the church…but many who have been trained through centuries of misinformation and absent the whole of Scripture are often struggling with their assumptions to make peace much less understand the differences. It’s as if certain key words were removed from the English language, or huge portions of our history was rewritten leaving gaps in an otherwise understandible timeline. All these scriptures are to be defined, not by man and their current verbage, but by Scripture itself, and only that which then stands in line with the Law (meaning, it isn’t also then left up to an individuals interpretation…as sadly, has happened in our history…using scripture to justify behaviors but the scripture was taken out of context).
The Canaanites, in Joshua (whose context is *all* of Genesis and Exodus), were the biggies, followed closely by the Ammorites. The church commonly misrepresents the scene as God clearing the way for land-ownership. However, their death was scripturally and clearly demanded as a penalty or judgement for turning away from God, sacrificing their children (they did this as part of their pagan rites to trade/gain the favor and tangible gifts from their gods…it wasn’t even to please or satiate them. Other practices were women were forced into temple prostitution, for material gifts from their gods), and mocking/twisting His Truth (teaching falsehood…remember we talked about the difference between actively blaspheming and just not knowing) . In dealing with Jericho (the city of Canaanites), what was at stake – remembering that there was not an individualistic mentality like you and I are accustomed to – was succombing to the idolatry and thereby erradicating the promise of Messiah. I’m planning to write something on generational things that might help clear this up after you read the text.
As with the above example, the only peoples that will be destroyed are those that turn from Him and not trust in Him. This can be found throughout the books of Revelation, Daniel, Eziekel and Jeremiah…there’s others…but these have the biggies. God’s plan is to have all men, HaShem/Satan’s plan is to cause is both to defeat God and cause a destroy those who belong to Him. Where that has been impossible, HaShem/Satan then causes a division between God and man through man’s faith and moral practices. The judgement is a central part of Scripture and the justice is our sole need for Messiah. There is a warning there for individuals who reject His call. But also, God is not without understanding that there are those who wrestle (2Peter 3:9-10). Additionally, you will find in the Joshua chapter that I provided, that not everyone was destroyed…God did cover those who were not necessarily believers (those who knew His name specifically…I mention this because of your question the other night about those who seemingly have no knowledge). I’m also writing on something similiar to more your question than the provided scripture, but in conjunction with what I promised to share with my readers about Yom Kippur.
Now, if you aren’t asking the question – you might after reading – does this mean that I should be willy nilly killing off people in the name of God whom don’t believe with me, or more simply put non-believers? This is the argument that Franklin and I were talking about concerning the abortion clinic bomber. Exodus 20:13 actually defines what I should do. I am not allowed to kill my enemies, much less a stranger or friend. Believers also understand that there is a marked difference in how God now deals with individuals this side of Messiah.
Now, Isalm knows this. Ahamedeinejad knows this – His religion venerates the prophet Moses, and recognizes Jesus as their prophet. Muhammad did and calls for the same – and the time of the Mahdi is all about it as well (in fact, that is the major reason for his coming)…which is why Ahmadinejad’s statement is so telling. That is also why the extremist Muslims don’t need to jump on, they can just nod in agreement as he’s stating what is vital in his faith. Those {Muslims} who claim otherwise are in large, those who are not completely given over to their faith. (And this is an argument that athiests lodge, but because they know no better than the uneducated Christian, they too are missing huge portions of Scripture that would make things clearer…but then they are seldom seeking). You have to understand that he sincerely believes in everything he is saying…it all lines up with his faith, and peace in that faith, according to that faith, will only come when all are under Allah and those who refuse are killed. It is a different definition for peace, and he’s using semantics for Americans who are too busy being upset at politics and have little to no understanding of the spiritual.
And you are right…there are thousands upon thousands that agree with him even knowing who states it – you don’t have to hide his name at all. Everything he said was taken from our liberal parties (both Republican, Democrat and other minor reps). He simply parroted what our own put out there – again…vs 42 is key.
Yeah, He did demand that entire groups of people were killed. But what gives me hope in every individual, no matter the religion or denomination or whatever, is that Christ made the final sacrifice for all who would accept it. And this is an INDIVIDUAL thing. People receive saving grace on a personal scale. In our old testament stories we have such (now this is before the Good News) saving acts as the “lady” (and that’s debatable, but I don’t care either way) who threw the red chord down over the side of the wall to convey a message to Joshua. In the midst of an entire community that did not serve God, she recognized what she was seeing in Joshua and his men and was spared.
:):)
I believe she was spared to live a life to glorify God. I don’t know that I know that for sure (that’s not the high point of the story, so I’m not really remembering that part), but it fits in with what I know about God. That is, that He is in the business of bringing His own back to Him, one way or the other, regardless of their culture. If they ignore Him, or turn their back on Him, they will suffer from their own decision an eternity apart from Him. Because the only thing that God is not willing to do to redeem His own, is to deny their self-will. We, the entire human race, were created to walk with Him and en-joy His presence in our lives. In an act of disobedience we threw that away… and yet He sent His incarnate Son to redeem us back to that, and His Holy Spirit afterwards to continue the work.
The only sacrifice “good enough” for the Creator and Father, was His blameless self. So we receive, as would anybody, anywhere if they asked, a second chance… and a third, and a forth… to sevety x seven… if we are willing (there’s that nasty little will thing again) to forgive as well. And it’s the hard part for us, because we’re talking stuff that happens one-on-one here, and most don’t like confrontation period.
BUT what we are in discussion about here is a corporate act of forgiveness that can’t happen, because Muslims do not see Christ as the Messiah and noone is saved unless they come to the Father through the Son. That is non-negotiable.
I’m sorry to rant… I love the discussion though! Feel free to not post this comment, no offense taken. And I hope I do not offend any of your other readers.
Tammy
http://www.snpnmnmi.wordpress.com
Ah, Tammy…do not think that that is why Rahab was spared…she was already, though not a Jew, living a life that was drawing herself nearer to Him….she was chosen and promised safety for the exact opposite reason the rest were being destroyed. Did she go on to live a life that glorifies God, or would that be her natural reaction to His plan? As you mentioned, we don’t know…but it is hard, based on her actions and what we do know about her to not believe that to be so. (See Matthew 1, Hebrews 11:31, and James 2:25) She stood, however, with Israel against her enemies. I don’t recall which post I did recently that has my points about exactly what calls the destruction of God upon a people/nation/individual…but this applies here. The protection of those who do not turn their backs on Israel is promised. Her’s was the action that caught God’s eye…and the small but significant part of the story was that based on her actions not only was she taken to safety, but so were her family (the men, women and children who were with her) though scripture reveals that they themselves had done nothing.
Oh, by the way – pretty much yep to everything else. I try not to delete anything unless purposely offending behavior occurs. Because of my earlier anon. poster, I did change some of the submission processes. It catches things with varients of anon. as well as more than one link for moderation…so if anyone happens to not see a post, it’s just in que for my approval.